Lately, some brands have recently renewed their corporate image. And this kind of thing reminds me of Pokémon or Digimon the . logos are evolving and go up levels. However, I see that these changes are common factors that lead to certain trends.
One of them is the minimalism, a style very suggestive and that few components can provide values \u200b\u200bto the brand. On other occasions, I talked about minimal aesthetics in packaging , today there are many packages that are simple, without exaggerated color combinations and accessories items. And the logo looks like this trend is also taking place. In Ultimately, today little baroque and minimal, a lot.
The truth is that these graphic styles I like, but I get the feeling of seeing more of the same and that disparate brands repeat the same patterns. This makes me wonder, is it really a given company has to bathe the spirit minimal, because that's what the times ask? I think there are more factors to take into account the nature of the brand, its values \u200b\u200band tastes target audience they target. not forget that in this visual image, everything counts.
So Then I show four cases of companies who have renewed their logo. Do you like these changes? What logo you stay?
digivolution I'll take this, because I liked the change to receive the logo from the beginning.
Grupo Prisa
This evolution has been the most surprised me, especially because the color change of the corporate colors.
has taught me Estevan Fran and I was not convinced. I am always inspired by the modernity and accessibility of superbola Chrome, the truth is that a browser is more attractive (and coherent) to see something that has more details and be in 3D. And if not, look at the logo of Sony Ericsson (love it):
Mahou No logo is a renewal, but packaging itself. I like the design (current), but I will miss the piece of paper that made the old packaging. Especially since I have been involved with that role in real battle ball, turn the bar with my friends hahaha
Greetings
much surprised and digivolve! (But well ^ _ ^)
0 comments:
Post a Comment